Online resource center to help you explore these key issues, and others, regarding your estate.

Practice Areas

Mr. Miller has many years of experience in designing and implementing a comprehensive variety of Trusts, Wills, and other estate planning documents, as well as settling estates in the most expedient and appropriate method. Further, he counsels and assists clients on becoming eligible for VA benefits and Medi-Cal.

Learn more
VA Pension/Aid & Attendance/Medi-Cal

Mr. Miller has been active in the area of VA Pension and Medi-Cal for well over a decade. He uses various specialized types of Trusts as well as non-trust strategies to gain eligibility for his clients and save the family money.

Learn more
Probate & Estate Administration

Mr. Miller has been settling estates (both simple and complex) for well over 40 years. The starting point is always to create a strategy to settle the estate in the most efficient manner possible with a minimum of taxes. Often times the strategy created allows the family to bypass Probate Court proceedings.

Learn more

Are We Asking the Wrong Questions About DOMA and Proposition 8?


By merv,

  Filed under: Blog, Elder Law, Medi-Cal Benefits, Veteran's Benefits

The Supreme Court has heard arguments regarding the Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) and California’s Proposition 8, but people on both sides of the issue will have to await the decisions, due out in June.  The cases focused on the level of scrutiny the laws ought to receive and the Constitutionality of the laws, both of which essentially define marriage to be between one man and one woman.  As a practical matter, though, the problems presented in both cases have little to do with marriage and more to do with whether domestic partnerships, civil unions, and similar arrangements are honestly a functional equivalent to marriage.

Indeed, the DOMA case before the court was related to an estate tax benefit  enjoyed by married couples: the spousal exemption.  In the case, a lesbian widow, who had a valid marriage in Canada, filed an estate tax return and owed tax.  However, if the marriage was recognized, the tax would have been essentially deferred until her own death.  A similar issue will arise in the future with the new concept of “portability” in estate taxes.  The tax was owed even though the couple resided in New York, where the marriage was recognized as valid, because the federal government defines marriage differently through DOMA.  This definition applies to all federal programs and benefits including, but not limited to, many aspects of Medicaid (Medi-Cal in California), VA benefits, including VA Aid & Attendance Non-Service Connected Disability Pension, and Social Security.

In states that allow same sex marriages, the difference between heterosexual and homosexual couples’ access to benefits can be huge.  For example, when planning to qualify for Medi-Cal long term care, which is subject to the federal law, a heterosexual couple may transfer assets from the ill spouse to the well spouse in order to fall below the assets requirements.  Similarly, some of the ill spouse’s income may be “counted” for the well spouse so that it does not need to be paid toward care.  However, if DOMA is upheld, in the homosexual married couples context, it may be much more difficult to engage in asset planning for Medi-Cal purposes property may be subject to gift tax and the Medi-Cal look-back period.  The ill spouse’s income must be almost entirely paid toward care and may result in impoverishment of the well spouse.  Although gay married couples and domestic partners in California are currently being treated the same as heterosexual couples, under California Proposition 8, the result would be different even if DOMA is unconstitutional, because Proposition 8 does not recognize a gay “marriage.”

The purpose of allowing these benefits to married couples is to evaluate and encourage the economic well being of both spouses.  As increasing numbers of heterosexual couples cohabitate without marriage and same sex couples continue to face hurdles to the recognition of their relationships, perhaps the better question is what economic units ought to be protected.  Is marriage the only arrangement where individuals may be expected to care for each other?  Or, are there arguments for allowing the counting of assets and income, or transfer of assets and income, to people other than spouses?  If so, which “economic units” should be considered and where does it end?  Irrespective of the outcome of these Supreme Court cases, it is possible that we will see significant changes to certain federal programs as a result of the legislative process in coming years.

Comments are closed.

About Living Trusts

About Living Trusts is hosted by the Law Offices of Merwyn J. Miller, as your online resource center to help you explore these key issues, and others, regarding your estate.

Merwyn J. Miller, J.D.

  • Board Certified Specialist in Estate Planning, Trust & Probate Law
  • Co-Author of legal text book and of “Don’t Go Broke in a Nursing Home
  • Teacher of law courses at public and private colleges
  • Continuing Education Instructor for attorneys
  • Columnist for largest regional newspaper in San Diego County and professional journals for 15 years, Contributing author to the book “In Your Service: The Veteran’s Friend”
  • Masters Degree in Financial Services - Estate Planning
Amazon
Journals
News
Testimonials

Previous Next
Free Consultation

Call 760-436-8832


Math Captcha + 23 = 32
In light of recent events, we have closed our physical office and our staff is continuing work remotely. We have web conference and telephone available to our clients. For more information, please reach out to us today.Contact us